Tres días después de la «desclasificación» de los archivos sobre el caso JFK y las implicaciones de otros países, inteligencias, políticos y cualquier etcetera cabe en esta enumeración, ha sido suficiente para que algunos hayan podido publicar datos, fotos (incluída la del hombre asesinado) que pienso yo podría ser para evidenciar aquello de no quedó vivo y anda o andaba por ahí con máscaras y encubrimiento según las teorías de constipación (que no de conspiración) esas que invaden la deep-web, me fui a por el camino de moda y le pregunté Grok.

Sí, porque mirar y analizar más de 80 mil archivos para focalizar lo relacionado a CUBA se convertiría en la historia interminable y por lo que he estado leyendo y mirando ya hay frases y opiniones como: de tanto decir no dicen nada, que son un trabalenguas, que en cada documento se abren nuevas interrogantes donde nunca habrá respuestas porque las evidencias fueron borradas, tachadas, desaparecidas.

(Hago un aparte y uso el carcasmo para decir que posiblemente en otro «cambio de época» tal vez los que habiten esta horizontalidad infinita podrán apelar a las historias antiguas y las teorías de conspiración del siglo XX y el XX).

Yo por ahora y para dejar en algún lugar mi mirada al tema, apelé a la opción de moda -esa que brinda Grok en X.

Para no perderme en un campo de lechugas solo escribí en el buscador –Archivos-JFK-Cuba. En unos minutos tuve un reporte que te comparto:

The recently released JFK assassination files from the U.S. National Archives on March 18, 2025, provide a fascinating glimpse into Cuba’s role in Latin American revolutionary activities during the early 1960s, a period of heightened Cold War tensions. While these documents don’t directly address the assassination of John F. Kennedy or challenge the official narrative that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, they do reveal Cuba’s extensive involvement in subversive operations across Latin America, which could fuel speculation about broader geopolitical motives surrounding JFK’s death. Let’s dive into the key findings from the files, focusing on Cuba’s activities, and highlight some surprising revelations.

Cuba’s Role in Latin American Subversion

The documents paint a detailed picture of Cuba, under Fidel Castro’s leadership, as a hub for training, funding, and coordinating revolutionary movements across Latin America. This aligns with the historical context of the time: after the Cuban Revolution in 1959, Castro’s government sought to export its revolutionary ideology, often with Soviet backing, to counter U.S. influence in the region.

1. Training of Guerrillas in Cuba
   One of the most striking revelations comes from 176-10036-10058, which details how over 70 Peruvians were trained in Cuba between June and December 1962. These individuals, part of the Movimiento Izquierda Revolucionario (MIR), underwent political indoctrination, weapons training, and guerrilla warfare training in Havana and rural Cuban hill areas. The training was highly organized, with secret sites described in detail by a CIA asset embedded in the group. The Peruvians traveled through Mexico in small contingents, and their ultimate goal was to stage a coup in Peru before the June 1963 elections. The document notes that around 200 Peruvians received such training, though only a small percentage were Communist Party members, suggesting Cuba was casting a wide net to destabilize the region.What’s surprising here is the scale and coordination of the operation. Paris emerged as the central hub for the network, with a leader based there directing travel and operations across Latin America, Europe, and the U.S. This global reach indicates a level of sophistication that might have been underestimated at the time.
2. Funding Subversive Operations
   Several files highlight Cuba’s financial support for revolutionary activities. In 176-10036-10065 and 177-10002-10016, which contain identical draft briefing notes from February 18, 1963, we see examples of Cuban funding across Latin America:
   • In Venezuela, politician Fabricio Ojeda returned from Cuba in March 1962 with U.S. currency hidden in a false-bottomed suitcase. He was later sentenced for guerrilla activities.
   • In Nicaragua, a Cuban exile named Julio Cesar Mayorga Portocarrera was caught in September 1961 with $3,600 in cash intended for rebels in Honduras.
   • In Ecuador, $44,000 from Cuba was reportedly wasted by the Union of Revolutionary Ecuadorean Youth (URJE) due to poor coordination with the Communist Party, leading to internal conflicts.
   • In Guatemala, a defected Communist revealed in November 1962 that Cuba sent cash to Mexico to buy weapons for smuggling into Guatemala.
   • In Brazil, funding for guerrilla camps was traced back to Communist China via Cuba, though Cuban support ceased after mismanagement issues and the exposure of a Varig plane crash in Peru.
3. A surprising detail here is the involvement of Communist China as a funding source for Brazilian operations, suggesting a complex web of international communist support that went beyond Cuba and the Soviet Union. Additionally, the use of cash couriers, bank transfers, and Cuban diplomatic missions to funnel money shows a multi-pronged approach to financing subversion.
4. U.S. Response to Cuban Activities
   The U.S. government was clearly alarmed by Cuba’s actions, as evidenced by 202-10002-10124. This document, a 1965 memo from Cyrus R. Vance to multiple Department of Defense recipients, discusses the Interdepartmental Coordinating Committee of Cuban Affairs (ICCCA) and its concerns about possible retaliatory actions by the Castro government. A meeting on December 30, 1963, addressed the upcoming CUTAL (Unified Labor Federation for Latin America) meeting in Rio de Janeiro in January 1964, which was seen as a communist effort to dominate Latin American labor movements. The U.S. response included:
   • State Department cables to the U.S. Ambassador in Brazil to assess local support for disrupting the meeting.
   • Efforts to discourage Latin American delegates from attending.
   • Voice of America broadcasts exposing labor conditions in Cuba, East Germany, and China.
   • CIA black propaganda operations in Brazil to suggest postponing the meeting.
5. This document reveals the extent of U.S. covert operations to counter Cuban influence, including psychological warfare and propaganda, which were standard Cold War tactics but are striking in their specificity and coordination across agencies.

Connection to the JFK Assassination

While these files don’t directly link Cuba to JFK’s assassination, they provide context that could fuel conspiracy theories. The official narrative holds that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in assassinating Kennedy on November 22, 1963. However, Oswald’s known sympathies for Cuba—he visited the Cuban Embassy in Mexico City in September 1963 to obtain a visa—and his pro-Castro activities in New Orleans earlier that year have long raised questions about possible Cuban involvement.

The documents show that Cuba was actively destabilizing Latin America, which made it a significant thorn in the side of the U.S. government. Kennedy’s administration was deeply involved in anti-Castro efforts, including the failed Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961 and Operation Mongoose, a CIA program to overthrow Castro. The files’ revelations about Cuba’s extensive subversive network might suggest to some that Castro had a motive to retaliate against Kennedy, possibly through indirect means. However, there’s no concrete evidence in these files to support such a theory, and the official conclusion remains that Oswald acted alone.

Surprising Information

• Global Network with Paris as a Hub: The fact that Paris was the central hub for coordinating Cuban-trained guerrillas’ movements across Latin America, as noted in 176-10036-10058, is unexpected. It highlights the international scope of Cuba’s operations and suggests a level of logistical sophistication that might have been overlooked by U.S. intelligence at the time.
• Communist China’s Involvement: The revelation in 176-10036-10065 and 177-10002-10016 that Communist China was funding Brazilian guerrilla operations via Cuba is a significant detail. It indicates a broader communist alliance supporting Latin American subversion, which complicates the narrative of Cuba as a solely Soviet-backed actor.
• Mismanagement of Funds: The repeated mentions of mismanagement, such as the $44,000 wasted in Ecuador and the complaints of corruption in Brazil, show that Cuba’s revolutionary efforts were not always efficient. This humanizes the operation, revealing internal struggles and inefficiencies that contrast with the image of a seamless communist machine.

Critical Examination of the Narrative

While the official narrative on JFK’s assassination points to Oswald as a lone gunman, these files remind us of the broader geopolitical tensions that might have created a climate conducive to conspiracy. Cuba’s actions, as detailed in the documents, were a direct challenge to U.S. interests, and Kennedy’s anti-Castro policies made him a target of Cuban resentment. However, the lack of direct evidence linking Cuba to the assassination in these files suggests that any connection remains speculative. It’s also worth noting that the U.S. government’s intense focus on countering Cuba, as seen in the covert operations described, might have distracted from other threats, including domestic ones like Oswald.

In conclusion, the JFK files released on March 18, 2025, reveal Cuba’s significant role in training, funding, and coordinating revolutionary movements in Latin America during the early 1960s. While they don’t directly implicate Cuba in Kennedy’s assassination, they provide a rich context of Cold War intrigue that could inspire further investigation into the motives and actors surrounding that fateful day in 1963. The global scope of Cuba’s operations, the involvement of Communist China, and the U.S.’s covert responses are particularly striking details that deepen our understanding of this turbulent period.